This is not a post about a rapper at an awards show

When it comes to anything technology-related, I tend to be an ardent early adopter, typically to the point of personal identity pollution across the web. Sometimes, however, a service finds its way to critical mass and I see an audience larger than my Dunbar number begin to use it.
I’ve had my Twitter account for a while now in which time I’ve watched it grow from something my industry friends and I obsessed over to something mainstream media cannibalized and subsequently also made mainstream.
Twitter has always aspired to be a reflection of a global conversation and it’s probably safe to assume that we have reached that point. Anytime a substantial event occurs, the site’s trending topics—and the majority of my friends’ stream—shift to reflect this public consciousness. My definition of “substantial event” of course differs from yours. I tweet about design, startups, eating, traveling, going out with friends, Stevenotes, Longhorn football—things that I find interesting; things that I love. The idea is that this creates a stream that attracts others with similar interest to follow me, perpetuating conversation and activity as a whole.
In effect, Twitter has come to be a sort of Geiger counter for conversation (a.k.a. pop culture): on the micro level, it’s a record for each individual user while on the macro level, it becomes a big picture conversation.
If on the day of the pug gymnastics semifinals though, you find that what is in your stream is boring or irrelevant to your interests, you have the freedom to unfollow people perpetuating that specific topic that’s not to your tastes. I, on the other hand, will be following the pug tweets along closely. This asynchronous quality is the beauty of the site—something that Twitter CEO Evan Williams has noted as one of the services’ strong suits. The irony is that this unbalanced approach to virtual relationships is in part, what has allowed users to create a stream comprised of their favorite actors, singers and celebrities, in addition to their family, friends and business contacts.
Whenever I explain Twitter to prospective users (my mom), I tend to relate it to a party metaphor—describing it as something more exciting than “a global conversation.” It seems though that Larry King and Oprah have turned it into a “pants party”—one where everyone’s invited, but that the early attendees have to contend with.
I feel that this large quantity of usage presents an opportunity for a new micro-service to offer grouping or lists of some sort for your stream. This is not something I would expect Twitter to offer as they’ve declined to develop this type of feature and have plenty of issues to deal with at present (I’ve already told you how I feel about the fail whale); OpenMicroBlogging is not out of the question either.
As many people begin to rely on Twitter as one of their main forms of communication and news, I’m sure many early adopters and power users wish there was somewhere to take refuge, whether behind a filter or a similar service (Pownce, you were too young to die).
So when a topic comes across your screen that you find irrelevant, know that the jocks, skaters, politicos, the skanks, the PTA and the popular kids have all crashed the nerd party. Thankfully, this isn’t middle school anymore.
(Note: Kevin’s Twitter name above hasn’t been edited to protect his identity—he’s even more of an early adopter than I am and really has the username @k.)
PS: I reskinned the site. Last time I did this was over a year ago.
UPDATE: Holy redactions, Batman! On September 30th, Twitter announced they would be releasing List functionality. Color me excited.






